No, the minerals argument is BS delaying tactics.

Not an analysis of Mills specifically, but Michaux' nonsense in the space. The errors are common.

https://cleantechnica.com/2023/07/04/how-many-things-must-one-analyst-get-wrong-in-order-to-proclaim-a-convenient-decarbonization-minerals-shortage/

As for SMRs? Please. Foregoing thermal efficiencies of GW scale for non-existent economies driven by Wright's Law with first of a kind solutions that won't around for a decade or two is another delaying tactic, not a credible solution.

Assessment of SMR claims:

https://cleantechnica.com/2021/05/03/small-modular-nuclear-reactors-are-mostly-bad-policy/

Assessments of SMR price points and scaling:

https://cleantechnica.com/2023/03/28/shoveling-money-into-small-modular-nuclear-reactors-wont-make-their-electricity-cheap/

As for hydrogen for energy, that's just thermodynamic nonsense.

https://cleantechnica.com/2021/12/07/shrinking-hydrogen-demand-hydrogen-decarbonization-will-have-major-climate-benefits/

I'd recommend checking your biases. You clearly have a bunch that are preventing you from seeing reality clearly.

https://cleantechnica.com/2022/05/06/seeing-climate-solutions-clearly-through-biases-missing-data-is-challenging/