Asserting that there is a very bad solution which should be ignored doesn’t require me to write in detail about biological sequestration improvements, which I have published on at length.

Farming Carbon Capture Has Potential, But Is Not A Magic Bullet

Soil Carbon Capture: Great Loamy Hope Or Bandaid?

Planting A Trillion Trees Is A Nice Thought, But An Unlikely Reality

These approaches have multiple value propositions, but mechanical carbon capture has only one that has scaled in any way, which is to provide a PR fig leaf for the fossil fuel industry.

Avoiding producing CO2 is much more cost and time efficient than any mechanical CCS solution.

https://medium.com/@michaelbarnard_46445/the-billions-spent-on-carbon-capture-over-50-years-would-have-gone-much-further-with-wind-and-solar-1cf6bcf6ad63?source=search_post

As for nuclear, that it’s the most expensive form of new generation that can be built and isn’t getting cheaper can’t in any rational view make carbon capture cheaper. Expensive times expensive=expensive.

Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage 2019

I would recommend you reconsider your sources of information and perspective on solutions.

The Short List Of Climate Actions That Will Work

Project Drawdown